Module 2

References

“Art.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/art. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.

“A whale talking to human on the beach on a sunny day, with lots of animals and people in the background” prompt, Craiyon, version 4, Craiyon LLC, 7 Oct. 2024, www.craiyon.com/.

“Create a SAMR analysis for pearson my lab math” prompt. ChatGPT, 10 Oct. version 4, OpenAI, 10 Oct. 2024, chat.openai.com/chat.

“No more war on earth” prompt, Craiyon, version 4, Craiyon LLC, 7 Oct. 2024, www.craiyon.com/.

2 thoughts on “Module 2

  1. Hello, Bifei
    I agree with you very much, in the series of images you show generated by Craiyon, these images are indeed too rough and a few are even very incongruous in the cue “no more war on earth”. While it’s true that they don’t qualify as art at all, I’m not sure that the line between AI-generated art and human art is going to blur as time goes on, and that’s something we can keep an eye on in the future. Then I agree with the Pearson MyLab Math SAMR analysis you generated using chatgpt, as well as the issues you raised that weren’t mentioned in the gpt generation. But what we need to analyze is a generative AI tool, and Pearson MyLab Math is an online course platform. I’m not sure if this is the right way to write it. But I think you’ve done a good job with this post. But try to add a couple of prompts from the reflection.
    Best regards,
    Shiyu

  2. Hi Bifei,
    This is a really well-written blog. I enjoyed reading it very much. I have the same view on art as you do. I don’t think AI generated art could classify as art because there’s no emotions or no ideologies that I can see in those arts. Human art, however, has meaning. Isn’t the beauty of art is that we can communicate with the artists?

    Your documentation of ChatGPT’s SAMR analysis on MyLab Math makes me wonder if ChatGPT is really “making things up”. It reminds me when I can’t answer a teacher’s question, then I just say something completely off topic to show I am listening to the class. ChatGPT is just like that. For example, you said you never experienced certain feature in MyLab Math that ChatGPT mentioned, I believe ChatGPT invented that feature itself.

    Overall, your post allow me to see that ChatGPT is not a very reliable tool for us to gain information. It certainly has values to it, but how much value might depend on how well we know to make the best out of it. This requires a learning process of using AI properly.

Comments are closed.